Subject: IPP> MOD - ISSUE: Should there be a "printer-tls-uri" Printer attribute or not?

From: Tom Hastings <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:07:32 PST

Section 8.5 last paragraph mentions the "printer-tls-uri", but the
Model doesn't have such a Printer attribute.  The directory section
does have both the "printer-tls-uri" and the "printer-uri".

A printer can have non-secure, secure, or both, I believe.

We could eliminate the both case and say that the way to have both 
a secure and a non-secure Printer object is to require that there
be two Printer objects.  With fan-in, both Printer objects can be
driving the same physical output device.  Then we could get rid
of the "printer-tls-uri" attribute from the directory section
and the 8.5 security section in the Model document.

Or we could add the "printer-tls-uri" attribute to the Printer
object.  What happens for the printer that is only secure?