Subject: Re: IPP> PRO - Use of special port for IPP

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 20:36:10 -0700 (PDT)

> From [email-masked] Fri Sep 26 18:19:10 1997
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 21:11:34 -0400
> From: Jay Martin <[email-masked]>
> To: [email-masked]
> CC: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: IPP> PRO - Use of special port for IPP
>
> Why can't we have it both ways?  That is, assume the standard default
> port 80 can be used, but also specify a "standard alternative port"?
>
> 	...jay
>

This is my proposal.  It would make life much easier if there was a
;well known; alternative port

Patrick Powell