Subject: RE^2: Some Comments on ipp92.doc - the issues we didn't get toaddress

From: Hiroyuki Sato <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:11:55 +0900

>> 
>> Most of these comments are on the ISSUES listed in the document that
>> we didn't get time to address.
>>
 
>> 4. 6.2.6.1 notification-events
>> 
>> ISSUE:  
>> Need to add a notification-address URL which allows the user or 
>> the client to specify mail:// or http:// 
>
>Is 'mail://' defined in some rfc?

If 'mail' means smtp, 'mailto' is a right one.
More precise definition is 'mailto:End-User-Address@domain'.

>> 5. 6.2.7.4 job-retention-period 
>> 
>> ISSUE: 
>> Ok to delete for version 1.0. It will come back when we do ResubmitJob operation
>> but that is when we need it, not now.  Same for 6.4.31
>> maximum-job-retention-period.  But keep the retained state (even though
>> not user affected in version 1.0), since its hard for client when the 
>> servers add states.
>> 
>
>I am not sure I agree with the deletion of this feature.
>

This maximum-job-retention-period/number is useful from a End user's 
point of view and our Salutation prototype experience.

Hiroyuki Sato
Canon