[IPP] RFC: print-quality-percent (integer(0:100))
Michael Sweet
msweet at msweet.org
Wed Aug 28 21:19:18 UTC 2019
Smith,
I do understand the appeal that some vendors have for adding more knobs to differentiate their products, however I can tell you from a client perspective that Apple is extremely unlikely to support arbitrary vendor print quality values since it makes for a bad user experience.
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> The only problem I see is that vendor- or site-defined print quality values, printer vendors likely want labels that can at least uniquely identify the additional settings, and that could have corresponding _tooltip and _helpurl content.
>
> Smith
>
> /**
> Smith Kennedy
> HP Inc.
> */
>
>> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute where:
>>
>> - print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),
>> - print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and
>> - print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>> ipp at pwg.org
>> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
________________________
Michael Sweet
More information about the ipp
mailing list