IPP> New HTTP Methods vs POST -Reply

[rdebry at us.ibm.com]

Classification:
Prologue:
Epilogue: Roger K deBry
Senior Techncial Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry at us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080


Babek, sounds encouraging.  I was going to make a few changes to the
white paper anyway to reflect your notion of getting the job handle before
sending
the data. I thought that everyone liked this scheme.
---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 02/11/97 07:53
AM ---------------------------


        ipp-owner @ pwg.org
        02/10/97 04:14 PM




To: ipp @ pwg.org at internet, Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM
cc:
Subject: RE: IPP> New HTTP Methods vs POST -Reply


>
>I support Scott's view. Let's keep moving down the path we are on  -- get the
>protocol right,
>then do whatever mappings we think are appropriate as a second step. I don;t
>think that we
>could standardize on the Microsoft approach because they are passing
>Microsoft
>internal
>data structures around.
>
>
>Yes. but that's happenig only in one case, and it only contains user id and a
>couple of other basic job properties. It would take me at most 15 minutes of
>coding to change that structure to its IPP equivalent.
>
>Babak